Flowise
Open source agentic systems development platform
Best for Individuals and teams looking to build AI agents without coding experience.
Overview
What it is
Flowise is an open-source visual platform for assembling AI agent workflows and chatbots. You can install it locally via npm, run it on-premises, or host it through their managed cloud service. It supplies modular blocks to connect multi-agent orchestrations, retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, and standard chat flows using over 100 large language models, vector databases, and embeddings.
Best for
The platform targets developers and product teams who want to build and test LLM applications visually instead of coding raw pipelines from scratch. Source examples point to teams embedding AI assistants into software platforms, running knowledge retrieval across structured and unstructured files (such as SQL, PDF, and JSON), and orchestrating multi-agent setups with human-in-the-loop task review.
Key strengths
- Flexible application patterns: supports multi-agent coordination, single-agent chatflows with tool calling, and human review steps within agent execution loops.
- Developer integration paths: you can connect external apps using Python and TypeScript SDKs, prediction REST APIs, or an embeddable chat widget.
- Built-in observability hooks: supports full execution traces alongside Prometheus and OpenTelemetry exports for tracking performance.
- Tiered hosted pricing: offers an entry point at $0 per month (2 flows, 100 predictions) up to a $65 per month Pro plan covering 50,000 predictions, team permissions, and 10GB of storage.
Watch-outs
- The platform is being sunsetted. The source announces Flowise is shutting down, so we do not recommend building new production architecture on it without knowing the timeline.
- Cloud volume limits are strict. The free tier cuts off at 100 predictions and 5MB of storage, while the $35 per month Starter tier handles only 10,000 predictions and 1GB.
- The source provides no details regarding how the sunset affects the open-source GitHub codebase versus the hosted cloud service, leaving migration requirements unspecified.
Pricing
Free
Free0
- 2 Flows & Assistants
- 100 Predictions / month
- 5MB Storage
- Evaluations & Metrics
- Custom Embedded Chatbot Branding
- Community Support
Starter
$35/mo
- Everything in Free
- Unlimited Flows & Assistants
- 10,000 Predictions / month
- 1GB Storage
- Community Support
Pro
$65/mo
- Everything in Starter
- 50,000 Predictions / month
- 10GB Storage
- Unlimited Workspaces
- 5 Users + $15/user/month
- Admin Roles & Permissions
True cost calculator
Estimate what Flowise actually costs for your team.
Free
Free
Starter
$175/mo
Based on $35/seat/mo
Pro
$325/mo
Based on $65/seat/mo
Pros
- Open source and community-driven
- Developer-friendly with APIs and SDK
- Supports deployment on cloud and on-premises
Cons
- Sunsetting Flowise project
- Limited features in free tier
- Potential scalability issues for larger teams
Frequently asked
›What is Flowise?
Flowise is an open source platform for building agentic systems.
›Is there a free tier available?
Yes, Flowise offers a free tier with limited features.
›What are the pricing plans?
There are three pricing tiers: Free, Starter, and Pro.
›Can I deploy Flowise on-premises?
Yes, Flowise supports both cloud and on-premises deployments.
›What templates does Flowise offer?
Flowise features ready-to-use app templates for building applications.
Alternatives to Flowise
See all alternatives →Same category, ranked by our score. Tap a tool to compare directly.
- PromptLayerFree tier
The first platform built for prompt engineering.
Compare Flowise vs PromptLayer → - AutoGenCustom
The Orchestrator for Scale and Complexity
Compare Flowise vs AutoGen → - BifrostFree tier
The fastest enterprise AI gateway for orchestration at scale.
Compare Flowise vs Bifrost → - DomoCustom
A unified cloud-based environment for business intelligence and AI orchestration.
Compare Flowise vs Domo → - ScoutFree tier
A platform for orchestrating AI workflows seamlessly.
Compare Flowise vs Scout →